Gaming Law Review, February 2006 [journal issue]

Yet another issue of Gaming Law Review has been published. The table of contents for the February 2006 issue (Volume 10, Number 1) shows that the following original papers are included:

• Proposed Johnson Act Amendments Seek to "Clarify" Distinction Between Class II and Class III Gaming by Heidi McNeil Staudenmaier
• The Vital Role of Patent Law in the Gaming Industry by Steve S. Chang
• Tribal Gaming in California: How to Negotiate the Regulatory Process by John Maloney
• Pennsylvania's Progress in Its First Year of Gaming by Mary D. Colins
• If You Can't Beat 'Em, Will They Let You Join? What American States Can Offer to Attract Internet Gambling Operators by Martin D. Owens Jr.
• What's Next for the Netherlands? Court Decision Might Nix Dutch Monopoly on Casino Gambling by Justin Franssen